Picture courtesy of Tabrez.
Review by
K3ZZA
on 28th Jun 2006
![]()
User Rating : 10
Respect :
+1
The Nokia 8800 mobile phone is simple to use. Don't spend £500 on this phone when you can get it on contract for £50. I saw how much this phone was, and I said "no way", as I don't have £500, so I searched on the net, as I really liked this phone and i wanted it. Anyway, I went to ...
K3ZZA's full review | 320 words | 1 comment added.
Review by
aisha1choudhary
on 20th Jun 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 3
Respect :
-1
I would not recommend the Nokia 8800 mobile phone to anyone, as it is useless. The phone freezes when you make or receive a call, and you can't hear the other person.
The phone is only good looking and nothing more.
Another piece of rubbish from Nokia.
And the award for the worst phone goes to ...
aisha1choudhary's full review | 120 words
Review by
slimbiskit
on 1st Jun 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
The Nokia 8800 mobile phone is all about style, but that's it! There is nothing special in it, so if you want a simple phone that is full of style, then this is the one, but if you're a more fiddly person and like to play with the features in your phone, then I wouldn't recommend it to you.
slimbiskit's full review | 94 words
Review by
dfgds
on 31st May 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 2
Respect :
0
I wanted the Nokia 8800 mobile phone from day one, and I had to have it.
When I first got it, I couldn't wait to use it. About 3 phone calls later I'm on the 2nd battery, so not impressed so far, especially after going through the features. My very first phone did more!!
On day two the spring ...
dfgds's full review | 211 words
Review by
pollo![]()
on 19th May 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
The Nokia 8800 is a stunning mobile phone. It looks and feels expensive. Anyone who wants loads of gadgets including a 2.0MP digital camera, look elsewhere, as this just does enough, but it oozes style while doing it.
You can have MP3's as ringtones, download pictures and use them as wallpaper, a ...
pollo's full review | 102 words
Review by
Eric Barker
on 10th May 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
I bought my Nokia 8800 a couple of weeks ago, and this mobile phone is excellent - A+. I'm 100% happy so far, and all my mates are looking to get one too. Great looking, easy to use, and really well built. My girlfriend bought me a gold plated mobile phone cover for the Nokia 8800 from www.Goldplati ...
Eric Barker's full review | 64 words
Review by
hexlessywa
on 2nd May 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 3
Respect :
0
The Nokia 8800 mobile phone is really, really bad value for money. This phone does not have anywhere near the amount of features you would expect, and the performance of the phone is not up to the price. Being one of the most expensive Nokia's available, this phone should have a better camera, far m ...
hexlessywa's full review | 105 words
Review by
osiris3657
on 30th Apr 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 9
Respect :
0
Overall, I like the Nokia 8800 mobile phone. It is a fantastic phone, and it looks fantastic!! The camera isn't bad, but the size of the keys may be a problem for anyone who sends a lot of text messages.
osiris3657's full review | 97 words
Review by
gyroz![]()
on 17th Apr 2006
![]()
![]()
User Rating : 8
Respect :
0
The Nokia 8800 is a very cool mobile phone. Nice feeling to hold it, but it is over-priced. Everything is good except the inside of the phone. It's almost the same system as Nokia used 3 - 4 years ago! Don't try to use it when skiing on the slopes; most of the time it's too cold to get it to start. ...
gyroz's full review | 84 words
Review by
Poocher![]()
on 9th Apr 2006
![]()
User Rating : 10
Respect :
0
I love mobile phones, and so I HAD to have the Nokia 8800 as soon as I saw it. It is beautifully designed and feels lovely to use. The colours/wallpapers etc. are really pretty (it is a very girly phone). I had trouble finding out how to turn up the volume during a call, but all in all I have found ...
Poocher's full review | 110 words

Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?