Have a picture of Motorola C975?, please send it to us.
Picture courtesy of Mark.
| Value for Money | 7/10  |
|---|---|
| Reviewer Rating | 5.9/10 |
| Overall Rating | 6.1/10  |
By bbrenf
on 10th Jun 2005
| Reviewers Network | 3 |
|---|---|
| Time Phone Owned | 1 - 6 Months |
| Screen Quality | 3/10 |
| Battery Life | 0/10 |
| Features | 3/10 |
| Reception | 0/10 |
| Style | 2/10 |
| Value for money | 2/10 |
| Overall value | 1/10 |
 bbrenf's recommendation | |
The Price
Almost everything else. A frustrating and unpleasent battery muncher that drops calls.
I have now dumped the Motorola C975 that I bought as a standby phone to use on the 3 network. (3 issues are well known and the price reflects the woeful relaibility and quality of the service). The phone was a pre-pay handset, less than £50 and it feels like it. The battery cover was cheap and loose and power did not manage to last a full day even when used sparingly. The signal did not hold well at all and 'call failed' was a message all too often displayed. Lack of Bluetooth makes the C975 a pain to use in the car.
I would not recommend this phone even at the low prices on ThreePay and definately not on a contract, it's just too frustrating and feels like a handset from the very early days of GSM.
| Helpful | Unhelpful | Agree | Disagree |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Total Respect: 0
Would you like to see a review that's not being listed?
marty111
on 20th Feb 2006